SWIM Investment Value Calculator
Investment Calculator
See the actual value of your investment in SWIM at current market prices
Your Investment
Current Price
$0.000000387 per SWIM
Price: $0.000000387
Required Price to Break Even
How much SWIM would need to rise for your investment to be worth $1
Price: $0.000000623
SWIM is a cryptocurrency token that launched in February 2023 with a bold claim: to spread wisdom through blockchain. But behind the buzzwords, SWIM has become one of the most abandoned projects in crypto history. Its price has collapsed by nearly 100% since its initial offering, trading volume is virtually zero, and there’s no sign of real users, developers, or progress.
What SWIM claims to be
SWIM, short for Spread Wisdom, says it’s building two things at once: a knowledge-sharing platform and a toddler-focused NFT gaming ecosystem. According to its whitepaper, the goal is to teach young children through blockchain-based games while also creating a decentralized way to share wisdom across the internet. It even mentions alignment with UNICEF’s Sustainable Development Goals - specifically education (SDG4) and climate action (SDG13). Sounds noble. But here’s the problem: none of it exists.
There are no apps. No playable games. No public GitHub repo. No developer updates since early 2023. No educational partnerships. No real community. Just a website with vague marketing language and a token that trades for less than half a millionth of a dollar.
The price crash
SWIM had a wild start. It launched with an Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) on P2B exchange in March 2023 at $17.98 per token. That’s not a typo - nearly $18 for one coin. Within months, the price began a freefall. By July 2023, it peaked at $0.020312 - still a 99.9% drop from its launch price. Then it kept falling.
As of November 2025, SWIM trades at around $0.000000387. That’s less than 0.000002% of its original value. The market cap is listed as $0.00 by CoinMarketCap. The 24-hour trading volume? Less than $2. That’s not liquidity - that’s a ghost town. For comparison, even the smallest legitimate crypto projects have at least $10,000 in daily volume. SWIM doesn’t even register as a real market.
How it works (or doesn’t)
SWIM is built as an ERC-20 token on the Ethereum blockchain. That’s not unusual. But here’s where things get strange. The project claims to use something called “Proof-of-Wisdom” - a consensus mechanism that supposedly rewards users for sharing knowledge instead of solving math problems like Bitcoin or staking coins like Ethereum.
There’s no technical documentation for this. No whitepaper section explaining how it works. No code. No developer forums. No one has ever shown how a toddler’s game could use “Proof-of-Wisdom.” Even CoinCarp, which tries to explain the system, admits it’s just a concept - not a working protocol.
It’s like selling a car that runs on “magic fuel” - you can describe how great it’ll be, but no one’s ever seen the engine.
Who’s using it?
No one.
Check Reddit. Check Twitter. Check Telegram. Check Discord. There are no active communities. No threads. No memes. No debates. Just a few spam posts from bots trying to pump the coin on obscure forums. Trustpilot has zero reviews. CryptoSlate doesn’t list it as active. Even the project’s own social media accounts haven’t posted in over two years.
Compare that to Educoin, a much smaller educational crypto project. It has active Discord servers, weekly updates, and a real user base. SWIM has silence.
Why it’s not a scam - but it might as well be
SWIM isn’t technically a scam in the legal sense. No one has been charged with fraud. No SEC warning has been issued. The team never promised returns. They just said they’d build something - and then vanished.
This is what’s called a “rug pull by neglect.” The team raised money through the IEO, listed the token, and then disappeared. No updates. No code. No communication. The project didn’t fail because it was bad - it failed because it was never real.
There’s no evidence the team ever had the skills, resources, or intention to build a toddler game or a wisdom-sharing platform. The whole thing feels like a marketing stunt wrapped in blockchain jargon.
What experts say
Bitget’s technical analysis shows a strong “Sell” signal across all indicators. The MACD is deeply negative. The ADX is high - meaning the downward trend is strong and consistent. CoinCodex reports a “Greed” index of 73, which is bizarre. How can there be greed when no one’s buying? The answer: a few bots or insiders are moving tiny amounts to create fake hype.
DigitalCoinPrice predicts SWIM might reach $0.00000347 by 2033. That’s still 99.99% below its original price. Even if you believe that prediction, you’d need to hold for 8 years to see a 700% return - on a coin with zero trading volume and no real use case.
How it compares to real educational crypto projects
There are legitimate crypto projects focused on education. BitDegree offers crypto courses and rewards learners with tokens. SkillChain lets users earn tokens for completing programming challenges. Learning Chain has real partnerships with universities and over $20 million in market cap.
SWIM doesn’t compare. It has no courses. No certifications. No teachers. No students. No partnerships. Just a token name and a dream.
Should you buy SWIM?
No.
Buying SWIM now is not investing. It’s gambling on a dead project. Even if the price somehow rises tomorrow, there’s nowhere to sell it. Exchanges won’t list it. Wallets won’t support it. You’ll be stuck holding a coin worth less than a penny with no buyers.
There’s no upside. Only risk. And that risk is total loss.
What happened to the team?
No one knows. The website has no team page. No LinkedIn profiles. No interviews. No press releases. The IEO was run by P2B, a small exchange with little reputation. After the launch, the team vanished. No GitHub commits. No Twitter replies. No emails answered.
It’s possible they were a group of anonymous developers who took the money and ran. Or maybe they were just a marketing agency with no tech skills. Either way, the project is dead.
Final thoughts
SWIM is a cautionary tale. It shows how easy it is to create a crypto token with fancy words and no substance. It had a great name. It used buzzwords like “wisdom,” “NFT,” “UNICEF,” and “blockchain education.” But it had no product, no users, and no future.
If you see a crypto project that sounds too good to be true - especially if it mentions toddlers, wisdom, or saving the planet - dig deeper. Look for code. Look for users. Look for updates. If you can’t find any, walk away.
SWIM isn’t the future of education. It’s a footnote in crypto history - a reminder that not every coin has a story. Some just have a price chart that goes straight down.
Is SWIM coin still trading?
Yes, SWIM is still listed on a few obscure exchanges like P2B and BitMart, but trading volume is near zero - often less than $2 per day. There are almost no buyers or sellers, making it nearly impossible to trade without drastically affecting the price.
Can you use SWIM to play toddler games?
No. Despite claims of a toddler-focused NFT gaming ecosystem, no game has ever been released. There are no downloads, no apps, no screenshots, and no user reports. The entire concept appears to be marketing fiction.
Why did SWIM’s price drop so hard?
SWIM’s price crashed because there was no real demand. After the initial IEO hype faded, no one continued buying. The project never delivered on its promises, so interest died. With no users, no development, and no community, the token became worthless.
Is SWIM backed by UNICEF or any real organization?
No. SWIM claims alignment with UNICEF’s Sustainable Development Goals, but UNICEF has never endorsed, partnered with, or even acknowledged the project. This is a common tactic used by fake crypto projects to appear legitimate.
What’s the difference between SWIM and legitimate educational crypto tokens?
Legitimate educational tokens like BitDegree or SkillChain have active platforms, real courses, user progress tracking, and verifiable partnerships. SWIM has none of that. It’s a token with a story but no substance - while others have products and real users.
Can SWIM recover in value?
It’s extremely unlikely. For SWIM to recover, the team would need to rebuild the entire project from scratch - release a working app, attract users, list on major exchanges, and prove real utility. There’s zero evidence they plan to do any of this. The project has been inactive since 2023.
Finance
gerald buddiman
November 4, 2025 AT 23:43Okay but like… who even thought this was a good idea? 🤯 A toddler game on blockchain? With ‘Proof-of-Wisdom’? That’s not innovation-that’s a fever dream wrapped in a whitepaper and sold at $18 a coin. I’ve seen dumb crypto projects, but this one? It’s like someone fed a TED Talk into a random token generator and hit ‘deploy’.
And now it’s worth less than the dust on my keyboard. I swear, if I had a dollar for every crypto project that promised to ‘spread wisdom’ and then vanished… I could buy a whole new laptop. And still have change left for coffee.
There’s no code. No team. No updates. Just a website that looks like it was built in 2015 with Wix. And yet… somehow… people still check the price. Like it’s going to magically bounce back. It’s not a coin. It’s a ghost. A haunted token. A crypto poltergeist.
I keep thinking-what if the team was just a bunch of marketing grads who thought ‘UNICEF alignment’ would make it legit? Like, wow, we’ll slap ‘Sustainable Development Goals’ on it and call it education. No one’s gonna fact-check that, right? WRONG. Everyone fact-checked it. And walked away.
It’s not even a scam, honestly. Scams at least try to keep up appearances. This? This is abandonment. The ultimate ‘we got the money, now go away’ move. And the saddest part? People still hold it. Like it’s a lucky charm. Bro. It’s not. It’s a tombstone with a ticker symbol.
I saw someone on X yesterday asking if SWIM was ‘a good long-term hold.’ I cried. Not for them. For crypto.
Kyung-Ran Koh
November 5, 2025 AT 14:35Wow. This is such a well-researched breakdown. Thank you for putting this together. 💙 I’ve seen so many of these ‘educational crypto’ scams, but SWIM takes the cake. No game. No code. No team. Just buzzwords. And the UNICEF mention? That’s not just dishonest-it’s exploitative. 😔
It’s heartbreaking because real projects like BitDegree are doing amazing work. They’re actually helping people learn. But then you get projects like this that make it harder for the good ones to be taken seriously. It’s like if someone faked a cancer charity to sell knockoff wristbands. People lose trust. And real causes suffer.
Please, everyone-don’t just look at the name. Don’t fall for the ‘wisdom’ pitch. Look at the GitHub. Look at the community. Look at the updates. If it’s silent? Walk away. You’re not investing. You’re just feeding a ghost.
Matthew Gonzalez
November 5, 2025 AT 19:42SWIM is the perfect metaphor for late-stage capitalism. You take a beautiful idea-spreading wisdom, educating children, helping the planet-and you hollow it out until it’s just a shiny token with a fancy name. No substance. No soul. Just a number on a chart that means nothing.
It’s not even about the money. It’s about the betrayal. The promise of something meaningful, turned into a casino chip. We used to believe blockchain could change education. Now we just believe it’s a tool for con artists with PowerPoint decks.
And the worst part? The people who bought it at $18? They weren’t just greedy. They were hopeful. They wanted to believe in something good. And that’s what got them crushed.
SWIM didn’t die because it was bad. It died because it was too good to be true. And we all knew it. But we looked away anyway.
John Doe
November 6, 2025 AT 18:13THIS IS A COINBASE BACKDOOR. I SWEAR TO GOD. They let SWIM launch on P2B so they could pump it, then dump it on the idiots who bought in. Look at the timing-right after the 2023 crypto rally. They knew people were desperate for ‘the next big thing.’ So they made something that sounded like a miracle. And now? The whales are long gone. But the bots? Still pumping. 24-hour volume? $2? That’s not a market. That’s a lab experiment. They’re testing how long a dead coin can pretend to live.
UNICEF? Please. That’s a decoy. The real goal was to get people to think it was ‘ethical’ so they’d ignore the red flags. I’ve seen this script before. It’s always the same: noble cause → no code → ghost team → price collapse → silence.
And now they’re hiding behind ‘it’s not illegal.’ Bullshit. It’s worse than illegal. It’s soulless.
Cydney Proctor
November 7, 2025 AT 09:42How is this even still on exchanges? I mean, really. Is BitMart just a graveyard for failed tokens now? I’d be embarrassed to list something this obviously dead. It’s not a ‘project.’ It’s a digital corpse with a ticker. And the fact that people still check the price? That’s not hope. That’s Stockholm syndrome.
‘Proof-of-Wisdom’? That’s not a consensus mechanism. That’s a punchline. If I had to guess, the ‘wisdom’ was supposed to be ‘don’t buy this coin.’ But the team forgot to include that in the whitepaper.
Also, toddlers on blockchain? What’s next? NFTs of lullabies? A smart diaper that mints tokens when it’s changed? I’m not even mad. I’m just… disappointed. In humanity.
Anthony Allen
November 9, 2025 AT 05:50I’ve been in crypto since 2017 and I’ve seen a lot of nonsense. But SWIM? It’s in a league of its own. Not because it’s the worst-there’s worse-but because it’s so… poetically empty.
It didn’t just fail. It evaporated. Like a dream you had at 3am and forgot the second you woke up. The team didn’t run. They just… disappeared. No farewell post. No ‘we’re pivoting.’ Just silence. Like they never existed.
And yet… I still get DMs asking if I think it’ll rebound. I always reply: ‘If you’re holding SWIM, you’re not investing. You’re keeping a museum piece. A relic of crypto’s most cringe era.’
It’s a lesson. Not in finance. In human nature. We’ll believe anything if it sounds like it could change the world.
Megan Peeples
November 10, 2025 AT 17:38OMG I can’t believe you’re still talking about this. Like, it’s 2025. SWIM died in 2023. Why are we even discussing this? It’s like someone dug up a flip phone from 2005 and asked if it’s a good investment for 5G. 🤦♀️
There’s no community. No code. No team. No future. It’s not a coin. It’s a cautionary tale. And yet… I still see people buying it on obscure DEXs. Like it’s a lottery ticket. It’s not. It’s a tombstone with a QR code.
Also-‘Proof-of-Wisdom’? Please. If wisdom was proofed, we wouldn’t have this mess. We’d have laws. We’d have accountability. We’d have… oh wait. We don’t. That’s the problem.
Sarah Scheerlinck
November 12, 2025 AT 07:29I just want to say-thank you for writing this. I’m from a developing country, and I’ve seen so many young people here get scammed by projects like this. They think ‘blockchain’ means ‘free money.’ They don’t know how to check GitHub. They don’t know what an IEO is. They just see ‘UNICEF’ and ‘education’ and think it’s safe.
This post could save someone’s life. Or at least their savings. Please share it. Translate it. Post it everywhere. We need more voices like yours.
SWIM isn’t just dead. It’s a warning sign. And we’re the ones who have to make sure the next generation doesn’t walk into it.
karan thakur
November 12, 2025 AT 16:18This article is completely biased. You are ignoring the fact that SWIM is a decentralized autonomous organization that operates beyond traditional financial systems. The team may have disappeared, but the token still exists on the blockchain. That is proof of its immutability. The price is low because the establishment does not want people to understand true wisdom. The real scam is the centralized financial system that you support.
Also, why do you assume that no one is using it? Maybe the users are too wise to post on Reddit. Maybe they are meditating on their NFTs in silent ashrams. You cannot measure wisdom with trading volume.
Furthermore, the fact that it is still listed on exchanges means that it has value. Value is not determined by volume. Value is determined by belief. And belief is the only true currency.
Evan Koehne
November 14, 2025 AT 16:16SWIM. Spread Wisdom. What a beautiful name. Like a whale singing to the moon. Or a toddler reciting Nietzsche through a blockchain.
I mean, seriously. ‘Proof-of-Wisdom’? That’s not a consensus algorithm. That’s a poetry prompt. ‘Write a haiku about the meaning of life, then mine a block.’
And yet… I kind of love it. Not because I think it’ll recover. But because it’s so absurdly honest. It didn’t pretend to be smart. It pretended to be profound. And that’s a higher crime.
It’s the crypto equivalent of a motivational poster that says ‘Believe in Yourself’… but the artist never showed up to paint it.
Vipul dhingra
November 15, 2025 AT 06:16Jacque Hustead
November 16, 2025 AT 16:42I just want to say… I’m glad someone finally wrote this. I’ve been watching this dumpster fire for two years. I used to think maybe there was a team hiding in the shadows, working quietly. But no. No updates. No GitHub. No Discord replies. Nothing.
It’s not even a scam. It’s just… gone. Like a candle blown out in a hurricane. And yet people still check the price. Like it’s going to flicker back on.
If you’re holding SWIM? I’m not judging you. I’m just… sorry. You deserved better.
Wendy Pickard
November 17, 2025 AT 03:21My uncle bought SWIM at $18. He thought it was ‘the future of education.’ He’s 72. He doesn’t know what GitHub is. He just saw ‘UNICEF’ and ‘toddler games’ and thought, ‘Oh, this is good for the kids.’
He lost $12,000. He doesn’t talk about it. But I found his portfolio spreadsheet. SWIM is still there. Listed as ‘Investment in Wisdom.’
I don’t know how to tell him it’s gone. So I just bring him cookies and change the subject.
Jeana Albert
November 17, 2025 AT 19:23OKAY I’M SO ANGRY. I JUST FOUND OUT MY EX BOYFRIEND INVESTED IN SWIM. I BROKE UP WITH HIM BECAUSE HE WAS A GHOST, BUT NOW I FIND OUT HE WAS ALSO A CRYPTO GHOST?!?!?!?!?!
He sent me a screenshot of his ‘portfolio’ with SWIM at $0.000000387. He said ‘it’s a long-term play.’ I screamed. I cried. I deleted his number again.
And now I’m mad at the universe. Why does the universe let people like this exist? Why does it let SWIM exist? Why does it let anyone believe in ‘Proof-of-Wisdom’?!
I need a drink. And a new ex.
Natalie Nanee
November 18, 2025 AT 00:52SWIM is a divine test. The team didn’t abandon it. They ascended. The token is now a spiritual vessel. The low price? That’s the ego dissolving. The zero volume? That’s the market achieving enlightenment.
When you buy SWIM, you’re not buying a coin. You’re buying a karmic lesson. The fact that you’re still reading this? That’s proof you’re ready.
Stop looking at charts. Start looking inward. The wisdom was never in the code. It was in the letting go.
Namaste, SWIM holders. You are the chosen ones.
Angie McRoberts
November 19, 2025 AT 21:23I used to think crypto was about innovation. Now I think it’s about performance art.
SWIM is the most honest crypto project I’ve ever seen. Because it didn’t lie. It just… didn’t do anything. No code. No updates. No team. Just a name and a dream. And somehow, that’s more honest than 90% of the projects that fake GitHub commits and post weekly newsletters.
At least SWIM didn’t pretend to be working. It just… stopped. And that’s kind of beautiful, in a tragic, dumpster-fire kind of way.
So yeah. Don’t buy it. But also… maybe appreciate it? As a monument to human hope. And human laziness.
Chris Hollis
November 21, 2025 AT 15:11Angie Martin-Schwarze
November 22, 2025 AT 23:48I’m so mad I spent 3 hours last night checking SWIM’s price. Like a zombie. I kept refreshing. I thought maybe… just maybe… it would tick up. It didn’t. It’s still $0.000000387. I cried. I ate ice cream. I Googled ‘how to stop obsessing over dead crypto’ and found this post.
Thank you. I feel less alone now.
Also… I think I deleted my wallet. I couldn’t bear to look at it anymore.
Janna Preston
November 23, 2025 AT 19:43Wait… so… no one made the game? Like… at all? Not even a prototype? No screenshots? No videos? No YouTube videos of toddlers playing it? I’m confused. Did they just… make the token and say ‘ok, we’re done’?
That’s… actually kind of impressive. Like, how do you even do that? How do you convince people to give you money for something that doesn’t exist? And then just… not do it?
I think I need to go lie down.
Meagan Wristen
November 25, 2025 AT 15:53I just want to say-this is why I don’t invest in crypto anymore. Not because I don’t believe in the tech. But because I believe in people. And SWIM proved that people will believe anything if it sounds like it’s helping the world.
It’s not about the coin. It’s about the story. And the story here? It’s a sad one.
But thank you for telling it so clearly. I hope someone reads this and walks away before they lose everything.
Becca Robins
November 26, 2025 AT 05:16SWIM is the only crypto project that made me laugh out loud. Not because it’s funny. Because it’s so painfully, beautifully stupid.
‘Proof-of-Wisdom’? Bro. That’s not a consensus mechanism. That’s a kid’s bedtime story. ‘And then the blockchain whispered wisdom to the toddler, and the toddler smiled, and the tokens multiplied.’
And the UNICEF thing? That’s not a partnership. That’s a vibe. Like wearing a ‘Save the Planet’ shirt while you’re eating a cheeseburger.
I’m not mad. I’m just… impressed. You can’t fake this level of delusion. It’s art.
Alexa Huffman
November 27, 2025 AT 09:23This is one of the most thoughtful and well-written pieces I’ve read on crypto this year. Thank you for taking the time to document this. It’s not just about SWIM-it’s about how we, as a community, let this happen.
We cheered for the hype. We ignored the red flags. We wanted to believe. And now we’re left with a ghost.
Let’s make sure the next one doesn’t get the same chance.
Arjun Ullas
November 28, 2025 AT 21:32This is a classic case of technological hubris. The project failed due to a fundamental lack of technical competence and a complete absence of governance structure. The initial IEO raised capital under false pretenses, and the subsequent abandonment violates the ethical principles of blockchain development, which require transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement.
Moreover, the use of UNICEF’s branding without authorization constitutes a breach of international intellectual property norms and ethical standards in digital philanthropy. The regulatory bodies must take notice and establish mandatory verification protocols for all crypto projects claiming alignment with global development goals.
It is not enough to simply warn investors. We must prevent such incidents from recurring through institutional oversight and mandatory code audits.
gerald buddiman
November 28, 2025 AT 23:10Wait… I just checked. SWIM still has a Telegram group. 12 members. Last message: ‘Who’s still holding?’
One guy replied: ‘I am. And I’m proud.’
I just… I don’t know what to say.
He’s not a fool. He’s a believer.
And I don’t know if that’s sadder… or more beautiful.