Quick Take

• Azurswap is a little‑known multi‑network DEX with almost no public data.
• Fees are advertised as low, but exact percentages aren’t disclosed.
• Security details, KYC policy, and liquidity numbers are missing.
• Established rivals like Uniswap and PancakeSwap offer transparent metrics and larger communities.
• Proceed with caution - treat Azurswap as a high‑risk experiment.

When you type "Azurswap" into a search bar you’ll quickly notice the silence. The platform shows up on CoinMarketCap, claims to support the "highest number of EVM networks," and bills itself as a low‑fee DEX. But the details that matter to traders - fee schedules, security safeguards, liquidity depth, and community feedback - are virtually absent. This review pulls together the bits of information that are publicly available, lines them up against the big players, and gives you a clear picture of whether Azurswap belongs in your trading toolbox.

What is Azurswap?

Azurswap is a decentralized exchange (DEX) that positions itself as a multi‑network platform supporting several Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) compatible blockchains. The service operates without a central order book, letting users swap tokens directly from their wallets. Unlike centralized exchanges, Azurswap does not hold custody of your funds - the smart contracts hold the liquidity pools.

Core Claims and How They Stack Up

The site’s marketing highlights three main selling points:

1. Multi‑network reach - Azurswap says it connects the “highest number of EVM networks,” but it never lists them. Competing DEXs typically name networks explicitly (e.g., Uniswap supports Ethereum, Optimism, Arbitrum, Polygon, and BNB Chain).
2. Low transaction fees - No specific maker or taker percentages are published. By contrast, Uniswap charges a flat 0.30% fee per swap, while PancakeSwap’s fee sits around 0.25%.
3. Easy wallet integration - The platform works with MetaMask, Trust Wallet, and other standard Web3 wallets, a baseline expectation for any modern DEX.

Because the promised features aren’t backed by data, you’re left guessing how the platform performs in real‑world conditions.

Fee Structure - The Missing Piece

Fee transparency is a trust signal. Users can calculate expected costs, compare across markets, and avoid hidden slippage. Azurswap’s lack of disclosed fees makes it impossible to run those calculations. If you’re a trader who counts every basis point, this opacity is a red flag.

For reference, here’s a quick snapshot of fee models on major DEXs:

Until Azurswap publishes an official fee schedule, you’re essentially trading blind.

Security & Regulatory Snapshot

Every reputable DEX lists at least three security pillars:

• Audited smart‑contract code (usually a link to a report from Certik, ConsenSys Diligence, or similar).
• Optional two‑factor authentication for the web interface.
• Clear KYC/AML policies for users who need to interact with fiat on‑ramps.

Azurswap provides none of these details publicly. No audit reports, no mention of cold‑storage strategies, and no regulatory jurisdiction are disclosed. Compare that with the following:

Uniswap is an open‑source DEX that undergoes regular third‑party audits and publishes the reports on its documentation site. PancakeSwap similarly shares audit findings and offers a bug bounty program.

In a market where scams and phishing attacks are rampant, the lack of visible security measures should push most traders to the sidelines.

Liquidity, TVL, and Trading Volume

Liquidity determines slippage - the larger the pool, the less your trade moves the price. Total Value Locked (TVL) is the industry’s go‑to metric for DEX health. As of Q32025:

• Uniswap TVL: roughly $4.2billion across all supported chains.
• PancakeSwap TVL: about $1.8billion on BNB Chain.
• Azurswap TVL: not reported - no reliable source provides a number.

Without TVL data, you can’t estimate slippage or gauge whether the platform can handle large orders. Trading volume figures are similarly missing, making it impossible to assess market depth.

Community & User Feedback

A healthy crypto project lives on community chatter - Reddit threads, Discord channels, GitHub activity, and review sites. A search for “Azurswap review” returns virtually no user posts, no rating scores, and no discussion threads. By contrast:

• Uniswap has an active subreddit with >150k members and a Discord buzzing with developers.
• PancakeSwap’s Telegram group counts over 200k members, and its GitHub repo shows frequent commits.

This silence suggests either an extremely new launch, a niche user base, or a lack of adoption.

Pros & Cons at a Glance

Should You Trade on Azurswap?

If you’re a curious explorer who loves testing fresh protocols, you might allocate a tiny slice of your portfolio to Azurswap - but only after doing a small test swap and confirming the contract addresses are correct. For anyone who values:

• Transparent fee calculations,
• Proven liquidity depth,
• Audited smart‑contract code,
• Responsive community support,

the safer bet is to stick with established DEXs. They offer the same multi‑network capabilities (Uniswap now runs on several L2s) and they give you the data you need to trade confidently.

Quick Decision Checklist

• Do you have the technical skill to verify contract code yourself? If not, skip.
• Are you comfortable allocating risk capital to an unreviewed platform? If yes, limit exposure to under 2% of your total holdings.
• Do you need the "most EVM networks" claim? Most traders find the major chains (Ethereum, BNB, Polygon) sufficient.

Bottom line: The Azurswap review reveals a platform that’s still a mystery. If you value data, security, and a vibrant community, stick with the proven DEXs. If you’re an adventurous early‑adopter, tread carefully, start small, and keep an eye on any future audit reports or official fee disclosures.